Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Transpl Immunol ; 77: 101777, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2238770

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Transplant recipients (TRs) are at high risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are used for treating mild-to-moderate COVID-19. However, reports comparing the efficacy of COVID-19 treatment without/with mAbs in TRs are limited. We assessed the efficacy of casirivimab/imdevimab against mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in TRs. METHODS: Forty-one patients were retrospectively evaluated. The duration until defervescence, oxygen (O2) requirement ≥5 L, and neutralizing antibody levels were compared in TRs with COVID-19 without/with casirivimab/imdevimab. RESULTS: Casirivimab/imdevimab was correlated with shorter duration until defervescence and non-requirement of O2 ≥ 5 L in TRs with COVID-19 [mean: without/with: 6 vs. 2; P = 0.0002, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.3333, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.1763-0.6301; 15 vs. 8; P < 0.0001, HR = 0.5333, 95% CI = 0.2878-0.9883; P = 0.0377, HR = 0.1502, 95% CI = 0.02511-0.8980]. Casirivimab/imdevimab was associated with early defervescence after adjusting for sex and age (P = 0.013, HR = 0.412, 95% CI = 0.205-0.826). The antibody levels between patients without/with casirivimab/imdevimab on the day of hospitalization were not significantly different (P = 0.1055), including 13 TRs with vaccination. Antibody levels were higher in patients with casirivimab/imdevimab at 3-5 days after hospitalization than in those without, at 7-9 days after hospitalization (P < 0.0001, mean, without/with: 414.9/40000 AU/mL). CONCLUSION: Casirivimab/imdevimab was effective and increased the neutralizing antibody in TRs with mild-to-moderate COVID-19, it may contribute toward preventing the progression.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , COVID-19 , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Receptores de Trasplantes , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/uso terapéutico , Oxígeno
2.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 20(11): 1022-1030, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2203000

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Many researchers have demonstrated that the seropositivity rate after SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus vaccination is lower in patients receiving oral immunosuppressants. In this article, we report on a comparative study on the seropositivity rate after 2 doses of coronavirus vaccine before or after kidney transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 111 recipients vaccinated after transplant, 19 patients vaccinated before transplant, and 10 healthy patients. We retrospectively measured antibody titers using preserved serum samples. The antibody testing was performed 1 month and 3 months after vaccination. The measurement was via LABScreen COVID Plus, which enables simultaneous determination of 5 coronavirus protein antigens. RESULTS: Seropositivity to coronavirus antibodies was observed in all 19 patients vaccinated before transplant (100%) and in all the 10 healthy patients (100%). Forty- six of the 111 recipients (42%) vaccinated after transplant developed seropositivity. Analyzed at each time point after vaccination, the mean fluorescence intensity of antibodies was unchanged between 1 month and 3 months after vaccination in transplant recipients who were vaccinated after transplant and developed seropositivity. On the other hand, the antibody mean fluorescence intensity in patients vaccinated before transplant was markedly lower at 3 months (posttransplant). CONCLUSIONS: All patients with renal failure who were vaccinated before transplant showed a high seropositivity rate, similar to that in healthy patients. The seropositivity rate for each of the viral fragment antibodies in patients vaccinated before transplant was maintained, as seen in healthy patients. However, in patients vaccinated before transplant who tested positive for antibody production at 1 month after vaccination,the antibody mean fluorescence intensity at 3 months after vaccination (posttransplant) was remarkedly lower than the mean fluorescence intensity at 1 month, which was probably caused by the types of immunosuppressive regimens used atthe time of transplant.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vacunación , Receptores de Trasplantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos
3.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 20(5): 463-471, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1863216

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Although the effectiveness of vaccines in protecting the host from infection has been proven, few surveys have been conducted on changes in antibody levels after vaccination of kidney transplant recipients in Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed serological responses in kidney transplant recipients after BNT162B2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine with the use of a reagent capable of simultaneously specifying the antibody response to 5 proteins: a full-spike protein (extracellular domain), 3 individual domains of the spike protein (S1, S2, and receptor-binding domain), and nucleocapsid. The analysis involved 111 patients who had follow-up over 1 month after having received the second of 2 coronavirus vaccines after kidney transplant. RESULTS: Antibodies were detected in 46 of 111 patients (41%). The antibody-positive rate in the kidney transplant group tended to be lower than that in the healthy control group, which showed an antibody- positive rate of 100%. When the antibody-positive rate was analyzed by the type of immunosuppressor used, the rate was 36% (37/100) for patients who used tacrolimus at the time of vaccination and 90% (9/10) for patients who used cyclosporine. Patients administered CD20 antibody (rituximab) before and/or after transplant showed a lower production of antibodies, which was supported by a smaller number of CD19- and CD20-positive cells in the peripheral blood as well as a shorter period between rituximab administration and vaccination. The percentage of responding viral fragments varied greatly among individual patients and showed no uniformity in the kidney transplant group, whereas the mean fluorescence intensity of individual fragments showed a certain tendency in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The appropriate timing of vaccination should be considered in transplant recipients who use tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil combination and rituximab as these drugs are deeply related to a lower antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Formación de Anticuerpos , COVID-19 , Trasplante de Riñón , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacuna BNT162/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Humanos , Japón , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rituximab , SARS-CoV-2 , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus , Tacrolimus , Receptores de Trasplantes , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vacunas Sintéticas
4.
Revista de Management Comparat International ; 22(2):193-203, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1335532

RESUMEN

The negative impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the world economy has been broadly researched and documented. In Japan, however, the Covid-19 pandemic brought along a series of transformation opportunities to corporates, government, and public education. This paper illustrates the organizational efforts of transforming legacy talent operations and organizational architecture at one of Japan 's largest software development businesses, Intec Inc. throughout the Covid-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the authors have also analyzed the impact of cognitive technology on organizational culture and global talent operations.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA